Home | News Archive | Publications | Conferences | Latest Evidence | Contact Details |
Background | Search/ Site Map | Presentations | Guidelines | Regional Groups | Links |
The Ambulance Service Association National Clinical Effectiveness Project Regional Group Structure
Published by the Ambulance Service Association National Clinical Effectiveness Project CONTENTS Background
ASA Clinical Effectiveness Project - Proposal for Regional Group Formation Background It was one of the aims of both the ASA/JCALC Clinical Audit Committee and the Northern & Yorkshire Regional Ambulance Clinical Audit Project to set up regionally based audit groups for ambulance services. Until recently the Northern & Yorkshire Group and the South East Ambulance Clinical Audit Group (SEACAG) were the only regions of the UK to have established clinical audit groups, the former through direct project funding and the latter through a desire to collaborate and share experiences. With the inception of the ASAs National Clinical Effectiveness Project in December 1998 it was deemed necessary to establish a network of regional groups through which clinical audit could be developed. It is also an objective of the ASA Clinical Effectiveness Project to promote regional groups in order to encourage collaboration, comparison and for establishing useful forums through which local and regional voices could then be heard at a national level. Similarly, nationally raised issues could more readily be fed back to the regional groups and to a local level. This proposal for regional clinical audit groups centres on the issues of
These concepts are by no coincidence also discussed in depth in the NHS document First Class Service and the Audit Commissions Life in the Fast Lane, both promoting collaboration, sharing of best practice and strengthening clinical audit/ effectiveness at both a local and national level. Each of the proposed regional clinical audit groups already has at least one representative on the ASA/JCALC Clinical Effectiveness Committee. Regional groups match as closely as possible the NHS Regions and also incorporate the proposed Trust mergers either about to become formalised or being discussed. Although these proposed regional groups do not exactly match the ASA regional groups, the representation of committee members is mirrored. In other words each ASA region is represented on the Clinical Effectiveness Committee through these proposed regional clinical audit groups. In each case the regional groups are formed within England. Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales remain as regions in their own right. Similarly the island services have not been allocated a specific region. It is proposed that all of the services included above would be free to join whichever regional group they felt would provide most benefit. For example, the Scottish Ambulance Service may could collaborate with the Northern & Yorkshire Regional Clinical Audit Group. The Welsh Ambulance Service presents a unique situation in that it constitutes of three internal regions. These internal regions meet regularly to co-ordinate clinical audit within Wales as a whole. There is then the further possibility of each internal region collaborating with its nearest neighbour. For example, North Wales may wish to collaborate with the services in the north west of England, Mid Wales with the Midlands group, and South Wales with the south west services. This proposal concentrates of the structure of the regional clinical audit groups within England. A two stage regional clinical audit group structure is proposed here. Stage 1 - Build from the existing groups, establish the larger groups and smaller peripheral groups Stage 2 - Incorporate peripheral groups into main group structure Role of Regional Clinical Audit Groups Role of groups* (*see article on SEACAG in Candour, Ambulance UK Vol.14, no.2)
Role of project manager
Local opinion can be discussed at a regional forum. The regional consensus can then be tabled at a national level through the regional representatives on the ASA/JCALC Clinical Effectiveness Committee. Similarly, any initiatives to come from the committee can be introduced through the regional representatives to the regional groups and down to action at a local level. Each regional group would also act as a focal point for training, workshops etc. surrounding audit and effectiveness issues. Visits from experts to give lectures or provide training could easily be facilitated through such a forum. With the proposed regional group formation given here virtually matching the boundaries of the new NHS Regions there is also scope for such bodies to represent the views of the wider NHS at group meetings and to aid in the facilitation of collaborative work.
References: A First Class
Service, Department of Health Stage 1: Six regional clinical audit groups within England. Key to Maps of Regional Groups (Bold denotes ASA/JCALC CEC representation) South East Ambulances
Clinical Audit Group
South West Ambulances Clinical Audit Group
West Midlands Regional Clinical Audit Group
East Midlands Regional Clinical Audit Group
North West Ambulances Clinical Audit Group
Northern And Yorkshire Clinical Audit Group
Stage 2: Four regional groups within England. Key to Maps of Regional Groups (Bold denotes ASA/JCALC CEC representation) A Northern Clinical Audit Group to include:
A Midlands Clinical Audit Group to include:
A South West Clinical Audit Group to include:
A South East Clinical Audit Group to include:
|